Legal Opinion

Moreno Const. v. Clancy & Theys Const.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 8, 1999No. 98-2041PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

722 So.2d 976 (1999)

MORENO CONSTRUCTION, INC., Appellant,

v.

CLANCY & THEYS CONSTRUCTION CO., Appellee.

No. 98-2041

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

January 8, 1999.

Oscar Gonzalez, Jr., of the Center for Professional Legal Services, Orlando, for Appellant.

Brian P. Kirwin and James C. Washburn of Lyon, Bergholtz & Kirwin, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.

ANTOON, J.

This is an appeal challenging the final default judgment entered against Moreno Construction, Inc. (corporation). The corporation maintains that the trial court erred in denying its motion to set aside the default upon…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Butterworth v. CaggianoSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Szteinbaum v. Kaes Inversiones Y ValoresDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Daytona Migi Corp. v. Daytona Automotive Fiberglass Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Quinn v. Housing Auth. of OrlandoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. DeRuyter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dawkins, Inc. v. HuffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Torrey v. Leesburg Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. Lindamood v. OFFICE OF STATE ATTORNEYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. Bruno v. AE Handy & Associates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  5. Marchetti v. School Board of Broward CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API