Goebel v. Colorado Department of Institutions
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey
We granted certiorari prior to judgment by the court of appeals pursuant to C.A.R. 50 to consider whether the trial court erred in defining the class of plaintiffs entitled to relief on the claims asserted under the Colorado Act for the Care and Treatment of the Mentally Ill (the Act). See §§ 27-10-101 to -129, 11B C.R.S. (1989 & 1991 Supp.). This is only one of several issues raised on appeal after the trial court entered final judgment as to part of the case pursuant to C.R.C.P. 54(b). The trial court concluded that, to be a member of the class, a person must be so mentally ill as to be…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Jones v. CoxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Woodsmall v. Regional Transportation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- People v. ChavezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- People v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Intratex Gas Co. v. BeesonTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Rowe v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- May Department Stores Co. v. State Ex Rel. WoodardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Walker v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Yuma County Board of Equalization v. Cabot Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.