Norwell v. City of Cincinnati
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Gorman, Judge.
Linda Norwell and V’Ann Ryther appeal from the trial court’s order entering summary judgment against them in their action against the city of Cincinnati for federal civil-rights violations and related state-law torts. The claims of Norwell and Ryther arise from their arrests by Cincinnati police officers for alleged violations of city ordinances regulating sidewalk sales of goods and merchandise. In their single assignment of error, they contend that the trial court erred because genuine issues of material fact preclude summary judgment under Civ.R. 56(C). We find this…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Chesher v. NeyerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Eysoldt v. ProScan ImagingOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Overka v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- H.M. ex rel. M.M. v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
- Alexander v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.