Legal Opinion

Trimarchi v. Together Development Corp.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided November 21, 2000No. CIV.A. 99-40000-NMGPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

GORTON, District Judge.

Appellants Horace Trimarchi (“Trimar-chi”) and Personal Dating Services, Inc. (“PDS”) appeal the Bankruptcy Court’s ruling that Trimarchi does not have a perfected security interest in the “Together” trademark. 1 Pending before this Court is appellants’ Motion for Reversal of Bankruptcy Court’s Determination (Docket No. 7). Appellee, Together Development Corporation (“TDC”), has filed an opposition to the motion, and appellants a reply brief.

I. Background

TDC’s business involved selling and servicing various dating services franchises located throughout…

2Cases cited11 opinions

Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. BrockSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
Greenwood Trust Company v. Commonwealth of MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
In Re David F. Laroche. David F. Laroche v. Amoskeag BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

In Re: Cybernetic Services, Inc., D/B/A Silent Radio, Inc., Debtor. Petitioning Creditors Byron Z. Moldo, Chapter 7 Trustee of the Estate of Cybernetic Services, Inc., Dba Silent Radio, Inc. ("Moldo") v. Matsco, Inc., in Re: Cybernetic Services, Inc., D/B/A Silent Radio, Inc., Debtor. Byron Z. Moldo, Chapter 7 Trustee v. Matsco, Inc., and Matsco Financial Corporation, Petitioning CreditorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
Petitioning Creditors v. Matsco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001