Legal Opinion

Hasselman v. McKernan

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1874PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From tbe Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

'WoklejST, J.

Action by tbe appellants against tbe appellees, to redeem certain real estate described in tbe complaint.

Demurrer for want of sufficient facts sustained to tbe complaint, and judgment for tbe defendants at special term; and judgment affirmed at general term.

Tbe material facts alleged in tbe complaint are, that on January 22d, 1866, one Matthew B. Tilbury was tbe owner of tbe real estate described, and on that day be mortgaged it to tbe defendants, McKeman, Pierce, and Yandes, to secure *442the payment of a debt which he owed them. Afterward, by a conveyance from Tilbury and by mesne…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holmes v. BybeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Swift v. EdsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1825
  3. Murdock v. FordIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Davis v. LangsdaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Haines v. BeachNew York Court of Chancery · 1818

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. TalbotIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Hosford v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Reeves v. HayesIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Gaskell v. ViquesneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Deming-Colborn Lumber Co. v. Union National Savings & Loan Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API