Rose v. Rose
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Chief Judge.
It is now recognized in North Carolina that a contractual obligation to pay support arising out of a separation agreement which has not been incorporated into a court order may be equitably enforced by an order of specific performance enforceable through contempt proceedings. Moore v. Moore, 297 N.C. 14, 252 S.E. 2d 735 (1979); McDowell v. McDowell, 55 N.C. App. 261, 284 S.E. 2d 695 (1981). The issue in this case is whether defendant’s contractual obligation to make monthly payments for a period of five years arising out of a property settlement provision of a separation…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Munchak Corp. v. CaldwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- McLean v. KeithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Burke v. BurkeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
- Burke v. BurkeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lyerly v. MalpassCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Cator v. CatorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Palmetto State Armory, LLC v. IKON WEAPONS, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2022