Legal Opinion

Rose v. Rose

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 17, 1984No. 828DC1263PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Chief Judge.

It is now recognized in North Carolina that a contractual obligation to pay support arising out of a separation agreement which has not been incorporated into a court order may be equitably enforced by an order of specific performance enforceable through contempt proceedings. Moore v. Moore, 297 N.C. 14, 252 S.E. 2d 735 (1979); McDowell v. McDowell, 55 N.C. App. 261, 284 S.E. 2d 695 (1981). The issue in this case is whether defendant’s contractual obligation to make monthly payments for a period of five years arising out of a property settlement provision of a separation…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Munchak Corp. v. CaldwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. McLean v. KeithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Burke v. BurkeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
  5. Burke v. BurkeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lyerly v. MalpassCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. Cator v. CatorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Palmetto State Armory, LLC v. IKON WEAPONS, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API