Legal Opinion

Cornman v. Graeber Stringing & Wiring Mach. Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 27, 1946No. 4536PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELSH, District Judge.

In this action the plaintiff seeks to enjoin the defendants from using the name of Graeber in the manufacture and sale of certain tag wiring machines, to restrain them from employing Frank Graeber in such business, and to secure an accounting of profits derived by the defendants from the manufacture and sale of Graeber machines. From the pleadings and the evidence, we make the following findings of fact:

1. The plaintiff is a resident of Pennsylvania and is in the business of manufacturing and selling tag wiring and stringing machines at Conshohocken under the registered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. White v. TrowbridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. National Distillers Products Corp v. K. Taylor Distilling Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1940
  3. Piggly Wiggly Corporation v. SaundersDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1924
  4. Guth Chocolate Co. v. GuthDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1914
  5. Ralph Bros. Furniture Co. v. RalphSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shipley v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Children's Hospital v. American Arbitration Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Weilersbacher v. Pittsburgh Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Application of StrainCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API