Legal Opinion

Guth Chocolate Co. v. Guth

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided June 2, 1914PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Guth Chocolate Company against Charles G. Guth. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, District Judge.

Plaintiff asks''that the defendant be restrained from using the name “Guth” in the sále of candies and from doing in his competition with it certain other things which it says are unfair.

It is a Delaware corporation; the defendant a Maryland citizen. Since he was 14 he has been a maker of candy. Until 1899 he_ was *752employed in various candy factories, presumably in subordinate positions. About that time he started in business for himself in Trenton, N. J. His capital was limited. His venture was on a very small scale. It soon came to grief. He moved to this city. He…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Howe Scale Co. v. Wyckoff, Seamans & BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Brown Chemical Co. v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co. v. Hall's Safe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Thaddeus Davids Co. v. Davids Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Fowle v. ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Madrigal Audio Laboratories, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Cello, Ltd., and Mark Levinson, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  2. J. I. Case Plow Works v. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Piggly Wiggly Corporation v. SaundersDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1924
  4. Western Stove Co. v. Geo. D. Roper CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1949
  5. Neubert v. NeubertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API