Legal Opinion

Paul v. Town of Greenfield

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The appellants sum up their contentions that the tax is void because: (1) There is no statutory authorization to limit a tax levy to an unincorporated village. (2) If the terms of the statute be construed as authorizing such a tax they violate (a) the state constitutional provision for uniformity of town government; (b) the state con*260stitutional provision for uniformity of taxation; (c) the due-process clause of the United States constitution.(1) Taxes may not be levied except pursuant to statutory authority. The crucial point here is whether the statutes confer authority to levy such a tax as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Grunert v. SpaldingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Gossens v. Mattoon Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Land, Log & Lumber Co. v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Thielen v. Metropolitan Sewerage CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  5. McGowan v. PaulWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Milwaukee v. Sewerage CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
  3. Handlos v. Town of State LineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API