Elam v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Ebbrhardt, Judge.

1. The evidence did not demand a verdict for plaintiffs, hence there is no merit in the general grounds of the motions.

2. It is contended that there was error in the exclusion of a photograph of the crossing showing that the defendant had erected a sign on the western side and facing traffic approaching from the west (the deceased having approached from the *657east) designating the crossing as dangerous and admonishing the traveling public that it was unsafe. The record indicates that the trial judge ruled the photograph “inadmissible at this time,” but later in the trial the…