Legal Opinion
Popow v. Wink Associates
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 27, 1993PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
269 N.J. Super. 518 (1993)
636 A.2d 74
DANIEL POPOW, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
WINK ASSOCIATES, T/A THE WAITING ROOM, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND JAMIE HEATH, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 15, 1993.
Decided December 27, 1993.
Before PETRELLA, CONLEY and VILLANUEVA, JJ.
Gerald Kaplan argued the cause for appellant Wink Associates through its general liability insurer (Berlin, Kaplan, Dembling & Burke, attorneys; Mr. Kaplan, of counsel; Kenneth A. Resnick, on the brief).
Eileen M. Egan argued the cause for respondent Wink Associates through its liquor liability…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Burd v. Sussex Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Howard Savings Inst. of Newark v. PeepSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Bowers v. Camden Fire Ins. Assoc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Deblon v. BeatonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Selected Risks Ins. Co. v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bauer v. NesbittSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- Steele v. KerriganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Glass v. Suburban Restoration Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Bauer v. NesbittSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- Price v. HUDSON HEIGHTS DEVELOP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.