Mitchell v. State

OPINION

ELSA ALCALA, Justice.

Appellant, Donald Ray Mitchell, appeals from the trial court’s postconviction order and findings, which state that the results of retesting of DNA evidence were “not favorable” to appellant. See former Tex. Code Crem. PROC. Ann. art. 64.04. 1 Appellant’s court-appointed counsel, who has filed a motion to withdraw from representing appellant, has filed an Anders v. State, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) brief in which he states that no valid grounds for appeal exist and that appellant’s appeal is frivolous. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S.Ct. at…