Legal Opinion
Urban Renewal & Community Development Agency of Louisville v. Fledderman
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided October 6, 1967PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CULLEN, Commissioner.
In condemnation proceedings instituted by the Urban Renewal and Community Development Agency of Louisville the jury awarded the landowner, Harry Fledderman, $38,000 as damages for the taking in toto of a lot with two connected store buildings on it at the corner of First and Jefferson Streets in Louisville. Judgment was entered accordingly. The agency has appealed, asserting several grounds of error.
The first contention is that the trial court erred in ruling that the “date of taking” as of which the property was to be valued was the date of the first public hearing on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Logan v. Chatham CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- State Highway Commission v. EarlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Dixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Tharp v. Urban Renewal & Community Development AgencyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
- Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. ClaypoolCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Levitsky v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- State, Dept. of Transp. & Develop. v. StumpfSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- Sun Charm Ranch, Inc. v. City of OrlandoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Usher & Gardner, Inc. v. Mayfield Independent Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
- Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.