Mueller v. CBS, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER OF COURT
AMBROSE, District Judge.
Pending before this Court is a Motion by Plaintiffs for Class Certification1 pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ Motion will be denied in its entirety.
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Factual and Procedural History
The facts and procedural history of this case are set out in detail in my Opinion and Order of Court dated January 3, 2001 (Docket No. 107), which addresses the question of conditional certification and notice for two *230subclasses of plaintiffs under the Age Discrimination in…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hart v. Rick's Cabaret International Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Bynum v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Allen v. Holiday UniversalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Richardson v. L'Oreal USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Jackson v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.