Legal Opinion · Dissent

Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. Industrial Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 26, 1988No. 3—87—0586WCPublished

1DissentJustice McNAMARA

I respectfully dissent from the majority holding affirming the Industrial Commission’s award. I would hold that claimant’s injury did not arise out of his employment.

The majority cites Jewel Cos. v. Industrial Comm’n (1974), 57 Ill. 2d 38, for the general rule that an injury which occurs while going to and from work on the employer’s premises is compensable. This broad statement ignores the widely varying circumstances under which such a compensable injury might occur.

Not all parking lot accidental injuries are compensable. (Peel v. Industrial Comm’n (1977), 66 Ill. 2d 257.) Although an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. County of Cook v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Jewel Companies, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Chicago Tribune Co. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Rogers v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API