Legal Opinion
Baker v. Siemens Energy & Automation, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided April 12, 1993No. C-1-91-306PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SPIEGEL, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Defendant Siemens Energy & Automation, Inc.’s (“Siemens”) Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 27), the Plaintiffs Response (doc. 29), the Plaintiff’s Objections and Answers (doc. 30), the Affidavit of Paul Shepherd (doc. 31), the Affidavit of Helen Glutz (doc. 32), the Affidavit of Allen Baker (doc. 33), the Affidavit of Roger Larison (doc. 34), the Defendant’s Reply (doc. 37), the Defendant’s Motion to Supplement (doc. 42), and the Plaintiffs Response (doc. 43). In order to hear…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Shirley J. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOLEDO HOSPITAL, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brocklehurst v. PPG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Baker v. Siemens Energy & Automation, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1993
- Grybosky v. Ohio Civil Rights Comm'nOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- 74 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 984, 72 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,149 Karl D. Brocklehurst, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Ppg Industries, Inc., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997