Legal Opinion

McMIDDLETON v. BOLLING

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 10, 2005No. Docket 261216, 261219PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

In these consolidated medical malpractice actions, plaintiff appeals as of right the trial court’s order granting summary disposition in favor of defendants Steven F. Bolling, M.D., and the University of Michigan Medical Center. We affirm and hold that the appointment of a successor personal representative cannot revive a complaint that the predecessor personal representative filed more than two years after being appointed.

I. BASIC FACTS

On April 1, 1999, Dr. Bolling performed surgery on Naomi Harris, which included a “mitral, tricuspid and aortic valve repair and a saphenous vein grafting of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eggleston v. Bio-Medical Applications of Detroit, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Waltz v. WyseMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Omelenchuk v. City of WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Solowy v. Oakwood Hospital Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Ousley v. McLarenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Mullins v. St Joseph Mercy HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Mullins v. St Joseph Mercy HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Mazumder v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Verbrugghe v. Select Specialty Hospital-Macomb County, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Ward v. SianoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API