Legal Opinion

Mullins v. St Joseph Mercy Hospital

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 2006No. Docket 263210PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

Defendants-appellants appeal by leave granted the trial court’s denial of defendant St. Joseph Mercy Hospital’s motion for summary disposition. We reverse because we are required by MCR 7.215(J)(1) to follow the holding in Ousley v McLaren, 264 Mich App 486; 691 NW2d 817 (2004). Fursuant to MCR 7.215(J)(2), we declare a conflict with Ousley and state that if we were not obligated to follow Ousley, we would affirm.1

*588i. FACTS

The decedent went to defendant hospital for a heart catheterization on March 22, 1999. Following catheterization and an angioplasty procedure performed by defendants, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Waltz v. WyseMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Omelenchuk v. City of WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Miller v. Mercy Memorial HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. McLean v. McElhaneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Mullins v. St Joseph Mercy HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Ward v. SianoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Johnson v. Hurley Medical Group, PCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Glisson v. GerrityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Boodt v. Borgess Medical CenterMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API