Legal Opinion

Blango v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 1975No. 8281, 8388PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YEAGLEY, Associate Judge:

Appellants were indicted for assault with intent to kill while armed (D.C.Code 1973, §§ 22-501, 22-3201), assault with intent to kill (D.C.Code 1973, § 22-501), assault with a dangerous weapon (D.C.Code 1973, § 22-502), and carrying a pistol without a license (D.C.Code 1973, § 22-3204). They were convicted by a jury of the last two offenses and this appeal followed involving four alleged errors: (1) that the prosecutor impermissibly commented on the failure of the appellants to testify; (2) that the trial court’s direction to the jury to continue deliberation…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Lawn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. United States v. PeoniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  5. Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Christian v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Byrd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. West v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Murchison v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Chambers v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API