United States v. Powis
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
CEDARBURG, Chief Judge:
Appellant, convicted by a general court-martial, military judge alone, asserts several errors for our consideration, of which the following two warrant discussion:1
I
THE RECORD OF TRIAL IS NOT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS.
VII
THE APPELLANT WAS DENIED HIS RIGHT TO A SPEEDY DISPOSITION OF HIS CASE.
a. The 300-day delay by the convening authority in taking his action following the remand of the case by this Court, is a presumptive violation of appellant’s right to a speedy disposition of his case mandating dismissal of the charges. Dunlap v. Convening…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. BanksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. NelsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- United States v. McCullahUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. GrayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. MilanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. WordenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. WilliamsU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982