Legal Opinion

Cosmopolitan National Bank v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 21, 1978No. 77-998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McGLOON

Plaintiffs Stephen Mack and Richard Kranicke are the sole beneficial owners of a vacant tract of land (hereinafter subject property) located on the southwest comer of Harlem and Cornelia Avenues in Chicago. The subject property lies within a B4-2 zoning classification, a classification which permits residential use of the ground floor of any building only if a special use variation is granted. (See Chicago, Ill., Mun. Code, ch. 194A, par. 8.3—4(1977).) The above plaintiffs and the legal title holder of the subject property Cosmopolitan National Bank of Chicago, applied to the zoning…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Foster & Kleiser, Division of Metromedia, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  2. Mile Square Service Corp. v. City of Chicago Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc. v. Sauk County Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Speck v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. Dakota Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API