Legal Opinion
Starr v. United States
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 13, 2003No. CIV.A. WMN-02-2010PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NICKERSON, Senior District Judge.
Before the Court is the Government’s Motion to Dismiss Count I, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (Paper No. 14). The motion is fully briefed and ripe for decision. Upon review of the pleadings and applicable case law, the Court determines that no hearing is necessary (Local Rule 105.6) and that the Government’s motion will be denied.
I. BACKGROUND
On August 21, 2000, Plaintiffs Judy and Jim Starr brought their daughter Traci, age 22, to the Kimbrough Ambulatory Care Center. Traci presented with complaints of vomiting and diarrhea for the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anna Mae R. Henderson v. United States of America, Anne Marie Henderson, by Her Guardian Ad Litem, Anna Marie R. Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Ahmed v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- White v. CMA Const. Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
- ACandS Inc. v. AsnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Frantz v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Chang-Williams v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Glover v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Wojciechowicz v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2007
- Bost v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- Charles Head v. Captain R. Rakowski, Jr., et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2026
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.