Legal Opinion
Signal Capital Corp. v. Frank
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 11, 1995No. 95 CV 5160PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PARKER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Signal Capital Corporation (“Signal”) has moved in this action for a preliminary injunction, pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, restraining defendants Hiram J. Frank, Clemence Frank and Susan J. Albert from disposing of or transferring their tangible assets or property, and an order of attachment, pursuant to Article 62 of the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules. 1 Signal argues that such restraint is necessary to prevent defendants through the disposition of assets from frustrating a judgment to which it expects ultimately to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Town of Hyde ParkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- In Re Feit & Drexler, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Republic of the Philippines v. MarcosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Brastex Corporation v. Allen International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Polymer Technology Corp. v. MimranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- DirecTV Latin America, LLC v. PARK 610, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Musket Corp. v. PDVSA Petroleo, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- In Re Amaranth Natural Gas Commodities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Bank of China, New York Branch v. NBM LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Elsevier, Inc. v. GrossmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.