Legal Opinion

Timmins v. Russomano

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1968No. 41139PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

Section 4511.39, Revised Code, states, in part:

“No person shall turn a vehicle * * * from a direct course upon a highway until such person has exercised due care to ascertain that the movement can he made with reasonable safety to other users of the highway, and then only * * * after giving an appropriate signal in the event any traffic may be affected by such movement.
“A signal of intention to turn right or left shall be given in sufficient time in advance of the movement indicated to give ample warning to other users of the highway who would be affected by such movement.’’ (Emphasis…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morris v. BloomgreenOhio Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jackson v. WarrumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Middleton v. HolbrookOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Trainer v. GibsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Barber v. LaFromboiseSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  5. Lumaye v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API