Legal Opinion
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Doe
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 3, 1994No. 94 Civ. 7826 (JGK)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KOELTL, District Judge.
On the present application, plaintiff Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (“Merrill Lynch”) seeks temporary declaratory relief declaring that it has the right, which cannot be enjoined by a state court, to proceed in federal court to seek injunctive relief in aid of an arbitration with a former Merrill Lynch financial consultant, defendant John Banks. For the reasons stated below, the Court, having heard oral argument from both sides and having received extensive evidentiary submissions, will grant the temporary declaratory relief sought. In the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Emily DistajoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Murray v. New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
- Vazquez Perez v. DeckerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019