Legal Opinion

Jackson v. McCuiston

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 22, 1969No. 5-5105PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lyle Brown, Justice.

This appeal resulted from the granting of a directed verdict in favor of defendants at the close of plaintiffs’ testimony in a tort case. Charles Eugene Jackson, a minor, and his father, Charles E. Jackson, Sr., sued the McCuistons for injuries caused young Jackson (called Gene throughout the trial) when his leg got caught in a tractor-propelled stalk cutter (“bush hog”) operated by the defendant minor, Lloyd C. McCuiston III. Young Lloyd was employed on the farm of his father and grandfather, who operated as a partnership under the name of L. C. McCuiston & Son. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dellwo v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. Paul Hardeman, Inc. v. JI Hass CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  3. Harrelson v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  4. Gates v. PlummerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  5. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. ConeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Flynn v. McIlroy Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Purtle v. SheltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  3. Farm Bureau Insurance Group v. PhillipsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Downey v. MaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  5. Robinson v. LindsayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API