Legal Opinion

Iowaska Church of Healing v. Rettig

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 31, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2021-2475Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IOWASKA CHURCH OF HEALING, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 21-02475 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Iowaska Church of Healing is a non-profit organization whose members’ sincerely-held religious belief partly involves the consumption of the Sacrament of Ayahuasca (“Ayahuasca”), a tea brewed from South American plants that contains a drug illegal under federal law. Pl.’s SMF ¶¶ 5-6, 14-15, ECF No. 20-1. On January 10, 2019, plaintiff filed Form 1023 with the Internal…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Davis v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API