Legal Opinion

Benvenuto v. State

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 2007No. 20060197PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURRANT, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

T1 This case is before us on appeal from the district court's order denying Jorge Martin Benvenuto's petition for post-conviction relief. Benvenuto argues that the State of Utah violated his rights as a foreign national under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations ("Vienna Convention") when law enforcement authorities failed to notify him of his right to consular notification upon his arrest. He also argues that he is entitled to post-conviction relief because his attorneys were ineffective in failing to notify him of his rights under the Vienna Convention…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Anthony Rozelle Banks v. Dan M. Reynolds, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, McAlester Oklahoma Susan B. Loving, Attorney General of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. RhinehartUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Kell v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Ross v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Medel v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Noor v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API