In re Palmer
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA In re WILLIAM M. PALMER II on Habeas Corpus. S256149 First Appellate District, Division Two A154269 January 28, 2021 Justice Cuéllar authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye and Justices Corrigan, Kruger, Groban, and Grover* concurred. Justice Liu filed a concurring opinion. ________________________ * Associate Justice of the Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution. In re PALMER S256149 Opinion of the Court by Cuéllar, J.…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Hutto v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- (PC) Cooper v. ShafferDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- (PC) Correa v. ShafferDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- County of San Diego v. Com. on State MandatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Henry C. Navarro v. Connie GipsonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021
- James C. Howe v. Martin GamboaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.