Legal Opinion

Valley City Land & Irrigation Co. v. Schone

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Grant county. Hon, J. 0. Andrews, Judge. Motion to dismiss appeal allowed.

1Opinion of the CourtKellam, P. J.

Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal upon two grounds, the first of which only will be noticed. The motion in respect to the ground to be considered is based upon the original records and papers sent up from the trial court,— more particularly upon the notice of appeal and the proof of service thereof, and upon appellants’ printed abstract, — and is urged upon the ground that neither the original record and the papers, nor the printed abstract show that the notice of appeal was served upon ‘‘the adverse party and upon the clerk of the court in which the judgment or order appealed from is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moore v. . VanderburgSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  2. Peck v. PhillipsSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1887
  3. Redhead, Norton, Lathrop & Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  4. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Long v. Knight Const. Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. HareSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. ArcherdOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Brannon v. White Lake Tp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Pierre Savings Bank v. EllisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API