Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kane v. Kane

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1929Published

1DissentRossman, J.

This is a suit to remove a cloud from the title of a parcel of real property in which the plaintiffs claim to own a seven-ninths undivided interest, and to secure other incidental equitable relief.

The evidence discloses the following facts: October 22,1922, Elizabeth Kane died leaving surviving the defendant Frank P. Kane, Sr., who is her widower, and nine children. Eight of the latter are plaintiffs in this suit. There are two defendants: one is the Frank P. Kane, Sr., above mentioned, and the other, who is the respondent Alice Kane, became the wife of Frank P. Kane, Sr., April 14,1925.

At…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Trustees of Amherst College v. RitchNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Sinclair v. . PurdyNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Wood v. . RabeNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. Goldsmith v. . GoldsmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1895

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API