Legal Opinion

Doe v. Blinken

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 17, 2022No. 2:22-cv-01841Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 JOHN DOE and JANE DOE, No. 2:22-cv-01841 WBS CKD 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO PROCEED UNDER PSEUDONYM 15 ANTONY J. BLINKEN, in his AND REQUEST TO SEAL official capacity as U.S. 16 Secretary of State; JULIE M. STUFFT, in her official capacity 17 as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary and Managing Director 18 for Visa Services, Bureau of Consular Affairs; JONATHAN K. 19 WEBSTER, in his official capacity as Consul General of 20 the U.S. Embassy Abu Dhabi; and UR MENDOZA…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. StoterauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Doe v. Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop EstateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. IwualaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API