Legal Opinion

Casey v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 29, 1969No. 44037PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhaedt, Judge.

1. There is no statutory authority for the direction of a verdict in a criminal case; consequently, enumeration of error on a refusal to direct a verdict of not guilty does not show error. Pritchard v. State, 224 Ga. 776, 779 (2) (164 SE2d 808).

2. The evidence, direct and circumstantial, fails to prove venue, which must be done in every criminal case. Smith v. State, 118 Ga. 83 (1) (44 SE 827). It may be done by circumstantial evidence (Dickerson v. State, 186 Ga. 557, 559 (199 SE 142)), and slight evidence is sufficient where there is no conflict. Well v. State, 210 Ga. 422…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pritchard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  2. Dickerson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Well v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  4. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Norman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Touchstone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  3. Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  4. Gazaway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  5. Norman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API