Legal Opinion

Norman v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 30, 1970No. 45291PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhakdt, Judge.

1. “In an indictment for simple larceny it is not necessary to state the location of the property or the place from which it was taken and carried away, further than to state that it was in the county in which the court had jurisdiction, unless a statement of the location is a descriptive averment essential to the identification of the property alleged to have been stolen.” Gibson v. State, 13 Ga. App. 67 (b) (78 SE 829); Kyler v. State, 94 Ga. App. 321 (1) (94 SE2d 429). Consequently, a demurrer to an indictment charging larceny of two turkeys on the ground that the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Wrisper v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Keller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  4. Pritchard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  5. Millen & Southwestern Railroad v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  2. Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. State v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Lynch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  5. Edwards v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API