Legal Opinion
Lingle v. Centimark Corp.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 15, 2024No. 2:22-cv-01471Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | Anthony Lingle, No. 2:22-cev-01471-KJM-JDP 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 Centimark Corporation, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Anthony Lingle has agreed with defendant Centimark Corporation, his former 18 | employer, to settle his own claims and the claims of a proposed class of similarly situated 19 | employees. He asks the court to approve the agreement on a preliminary basis and give notice to 20 | the proposed class. As explained in this order, although Lingle has demonstrated the proposed…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Tyson Foods, Inc. v. BouaphakeoSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.