Legal Opinion

Francis D. Houston v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 7, 1962No. 342-59Published

1Per curiam

Plaintiff brings this suit under section 14 of the Veterans’ Preference Act (58 Stat. 387, 390; 5 U.S.C. § 863) for loss of pay for his alleged wrongful discharge. Defendant, after having answered denying the crucial allegations of the petition, filed a motion for summary judgment, on the ground that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and that plaintiff is not entitled to recover as a matter of law. It says he is not entitled to recover as a matter of law for two reasons: first, that he is collaterally estopped by a judgment of the District Court for the District of Columbia,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Washington Times Co. v. BonnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  2. Armand v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  3. Peoples Life Insurance v. TalleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1936
  4. Sinclair Refining Company v. FullerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  5. Kenny v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API