Legal Opinion

Haddad v. Rav Bahamas, Ltd.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided November 12, 2008No. 05-21013-CIVPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE REPORT AND TESTIMONY OF PLAINTIFF’S EXPERT BARRY MUKA-MAL

PATRICIA A. SEITZ, District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Report and Testimony of Plaintiffs Expert Barry Mu-kamal (“Mukamal”) [DE 198]. Defendants seek to exclude Mr. Mukamal’s testimony because: (1) invalid assumptions render his methodology unreliable; and (2) he utilizes an impermissible time frame that is unhelpful to the jury. Having reviewed the motion, the response and the reply thereto, the report and the entire factual record, Defendants’…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Roderic R. McDowell v. Pernell BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Louise Cook v. Sheriff of Monroe CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  5. Grossman Holdings Ltd. v. HourihanSupreme Court of Florida · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kleiman v. WrightDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API