Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bard v. Weathervane of Michigan

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 1974No. Docket 16549Published

1DissentHolbrook, J.

This writer agrees with Judge Quinn’s statement of facts except in certain particulars. A jury trial was held on the cause described by my brother, but the trial judge granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict after Sharon Bard had testified, and after an offer of proof was made by plaintiffs’ attorney on their behalf. Plaintiffs had not actually rested their *332case, but only suspended it, all parties apparently agreeing .that further elucidation of the facts would be irrelevant if they could not agree on the standard of due care owed to plaintiffs by the defendant. Thus, this writer…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Jeswald v. HuttOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Taylor v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Kremer v. Carr's Food Center, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1969
  4. McKellar v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Luebeck v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1968

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API