Legal Opinion

Jameson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 7, 1998No. CR 97-1043PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

Appellant James Jameson brings this appeal from his convictions of kidnapping, a class Y felony, and rape of a five-year-old victim, E.C. He raises three points for reversal, but we hold none has merit.

Because this court considers review of sufficiency of the evidence arguments prior to a review of trial errors, we first address Jameson’s argument that the trial court erred in denying his motion for directed verdict on the rape charge. Williams v. State, 329 Ark. 8, 946 S.W.2d 678 (1997). The test on appeal, of course, is whether there is substantial evidence to support the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Lukach v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  5. Roleson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Pratt v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. Windsor v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Skiver v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API