Legal Opinion
Schendel ex rel. Schendel v. District Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 27, 1923No. 23,659PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Writ of mandamus, original in this court, on the relation of A. D. Schendel, special administrator of Thomas Kopcznysln, to compel *381the district court of Lyon county to proceed with an action pending therein in which the relator is the plaintiff and the Chicago & North Western Bailway Company is the defendant.
The 'case was at issue and on thé calendar for the June, .1923, term. The court, on motion of the defendant, declined to proceed with the trial, and dismissed the action, upon the ground that its trial in Lyon county, or elsewhere in the state, would' unduly interfere with and burden and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Claflin v. HousemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- The Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Chambers v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Davis v. Farmers Co-Operative Equity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Hoxie v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bowles v. Barde Steel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1945
- Erving v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Boright v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Schultz v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Desper v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.