Legal Opinion

STEAGALD v. EASON

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 6, 2017No. S16G0293

1Opinion of the Court

300 Ga. 717

FINAL COPY S16G0293. STEAGALD et al v. EASON et al. BLACKWELL, Justice. Gary and Lori Steagald sued David, Cheryl, and Joshua Eason, alleging that the Easons failed to keep Joshua’s dog properly restrained, and asserting that the Easons, therefore, were liable under OCGA § 51-2-7 for injuries that Lori sustained when the dog attacked her as she was visiting the Eason home. The Easons filed a motion for summary judgment, contending that the Steagalds had no evidence that the Easons had reason to know the dog to be vicious or dangerous and, therefore, in need of restraint. The trial…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Munroe v. Universal Health Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  2. Harvey v. BuchananSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Nguyen v. Southwestern Emergency Physicians, P.C.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  4. Sinclair v. FriedlanderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  5. Hamilton v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API