Legal Opinion

Horwitt v. Movado Watch Agency, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 13, 1973No. 71 Civ. 5537PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LASKER, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Nathan Horwitt, brought this action against Movado Watch Agency, Inc. (“Movado”), to recover royalties on the sale of watches and clocks whose faces follow a design for which he has been granted a patent. Horwitt has moved for partial summary judgment, to dismiss Movado’s amended third and fourth counterclaims and to censure Movado’s counsel on grounds discussed below. Movado has moved to amend its sixth counterclaim and to bring in an additional party defendant on that counterclaim.

7. Motion for partial summary judgment.

Horwitt bases his motion for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
Birdsell v. ShaliolSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
Painton & Company, Ltd., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Bourns, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
Lawrence-Williams Co. v. Societe Enfants Gombault Et CieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Atlas Chemical Industries, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Moraine Products, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
Papst Motoren GMbH & Co. KG v. Kanematsu-Goshu (U.S.A.) Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986