Legal Opinion
Rider v. Pool Offshore Co.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided October 1, 1997No. Civil Action 96-3716Published
1Opinion of the Court
PORTEOUS, District Judge.
Before this court are the motions of defendant, Pool Company, for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. These motions came for hearing on an earlier date and oral argument was waived. Having reviewed the motion and memoranda, exhibits and applicable law, this court sits ready to rule.
I. BACKGROUND
On April 22, 1995, plaintiffs, Danny Rider (“Rider”) and Gregory Billiot (“Billiot”), were working at Pool Company’s (“Pool”) facility in Harvey, Louisiana. Plaintiffs were allegedly assisting Pool personnel in the construction of a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mary Faye Skotak, George Jerry Skotak, and Eric Norman Skotak, Cross-Appellees v. Tenneco Resins, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Tubacex, Inc. v. M/V RisanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.