Legal Opinion
Huezo v. Los Angeles Community College District
District Court, C.D. California
Decided September 9, 2008No. Case CV 04-9772 MMM (JWJx)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION
MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge.
I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On December 1, 2004, plaintiff Marvin Huezo filed this action against the Los Angeles Community College District (“the District”) and certain unnamed defendants. Huezo requires the use of a wheelchair or other mobility devices to attend classes and gain access to public facilities at Pierce College, a state community college located in the San Fernando Valley. Huezo alleged that defendants failed to make the educational facilities accessible to mobility-impaired…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Iverson v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Armstrong v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Duvall v. County of KitsapCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Blackwell v. FoleyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
- D.R. Ex Rel. Courtney R. v. Antelope Valley Union High School DistrictDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Lasky v. BOROUGH OF HIGHTSTOWNNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
- LA Alliance for Human Rights v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021
- Praecipio Consulting, LLC v. HowserDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025