Legal Opinion

Leonard v. . Davis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 26, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, J.

Tbe third assignment of error is as follows: “This objection is based upon tbe court’s refusal to admit evidence competent and relevant to tbe suit (E., p. 17).” And there are several other assignments of error of exactly tbe same tenor. We are precluded from considering these exceptions as they do not comply with tbe rules of practice prescribed for tbe presentation of exceptions on appeal. Byrd v. Southerland, 186 N. C., 384. Eules are of no value unless they are to be observed uniformly and without exception, in tbe absence of some valid reason therefor. Lee v. Baird, 146 N. C., 361.

On tbe…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lee v. . BairdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Byrd v. . SoutherlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. State v. . BurnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Miller v. Acorn Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API