Legal Opinion
Lindsey v. Thomson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 10, 2007No. 06-7114PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
TERRENCE L. O’BRIEN, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Ray Lindsey filed a pro se complaint and amended complaint against various defendants pursuant to several statutory civil rights statutes and sought $8 million in actual, $8 million in punitive and $8 million in “smart money” damages. (R. Vol. I, Doc. 1 at 6.)…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Lymon v. Aramark Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
- Jemaneh v. University of WyomingDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2015
- Holmes v. Grant Cnty. Sheriff Dep'tDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
- Affordable Bail Bonds, Inc. v. Tulsa County Sheriff's OfficeDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2019
- Alan Jerod Keller v. Kay County Sheriffs Office, et al.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2026
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.