Legal Opinion

West v. Visalia Abstract Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 11, 1921No. Civ. No. 2274PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The record justifies this statement of facts: Messrs. Gibson, Quinn, and Snell were the owners of a certain tract of land in Tulare County. Mr. Gibson agreed with one J. W. Fewel that if the latter would find a purchaser for the land that the owners would sell it for sixty-five thousand dollars cash and Fewel could retain all above that sum that the purchaser might pay for the land. Fewel at once entered into a verbal agreement with one J. E. West that if the latter would assist the former in finding a purchaser they would divide the profits or commissions equally, and, if desirable, they…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lanning v. TalmageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  2. Gould v. OttoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Seaver v. WauhabCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API