Homan v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Senior Judge Barbieri:
Most respectfully I must dissent. There can be no doubt that Claimant left her employment because of what she considered to be sexual harassment, and I might agree with the majority view that she was justified in leaving her employment. My disagreement, however, is with the majority’s conclusion that the Board erred in failing to award benefits, because I can find no basis for a decision that the Board was guilty of reversible error.
The Board found:
5. The claimant did not register a specific complaint alleging sexual harassment following any of these…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Colduvell v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Geesey v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Kells v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Danner v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.