Legal Opinion

Danner v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1982No. Appeals, Nos. 2219 C.D. 1980 and 3026 C.D. 1980PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Beatt,

The petitioner, Richard D. Danner, who says that he terminated his employment because of harassment by fellow workers, now challenges a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which denied benefits on the ground that he did not notify his supervisor of the harassment and that he therefore did not have necessitous and compelling cause to quit.1

The petitioner had the burden of establishing that he had a necessitous and compelling cause for terminating his employment and it is generally required that, in sustaining this burden, a claimant must…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Colduvell v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Galla v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ann Kearney Astolfi DMD PC v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Collier Stone Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Homan v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Mazur v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Unclaimed Freight Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API