Danner v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Beatt,
The petitioner, Richard D. Danner, who says that he terminated his employment because of harassment by fellow workers, now challenges a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which denied benefits on the ground that he did not notify his supervisor of the harassment and that he therefore did not have necessitous and compelling cause to quit.1
The petitioner had the burden of establishing that he had a necessitous and compelling cause for terminating his employment and it is generally required that, in sustaining this burden, a claimant must…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Colduvell v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Galla v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ann Kearney Astolfi DMD PC v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Collier Stone Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Homan v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Mazur v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Unclaimed Freight Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.