Van Independent School District v. McCarty
Texas Supreme Court
1DissentJustice O’Neill
The Court, without the benefit of oral argument, summarily resolves an issue of first impression by holding that compliance with non-statutory administrative deadlines was a jurisdictional prerequisite to filing suit in this case. Moreover, the Court does so without acknowledging the impact of its holding. I believe that McCarty exhausted his administrative remedies by requesting the Board to hold a hearing on his grievance and to waive the non-statutory deadline for filing the request. I also believe that the purpose of the exhaustion requirement was satisfied in this case. Because I would…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dubai Petroleum Co. v. KaziTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Schroeder v. Texas Iron Works, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
- Wilmer-Hutchins Independent School District v. SullivanTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Van Independent School District v. McCartyTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- United States v. Charles J. PaternostroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.