Legal Opinion · Dissent

Van Independent School District v. McCarty

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 2005No. 03-1123Published

1DissentJustice O’Neill

The Court, without the benefit of oral argument, summarily resolves an issue of first impression by holding that compliance with non-statutory administrative deadlines was a jurisdictional prerequisite to filing suit in this case. Moreover, the Court does so without acknowledging the impact of its holding. I believe that McCarty exhausted his administrative remedies by requesting the Board to hold a hearing on his grievance and to waive the non-statutory deadline for filing the request. I also believe that the purpose of the exhaustion requirement was satisfied in this case. Because I would…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dubai Petroleum Co. v. KaziTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Schroeder v. Texas Iron Works, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Wilmer-Hutchins Independent School District v. SullivanTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Van Independent School District v. McCartyTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  5. United States v. Charles J. PaternostroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API